ZIPsZoo Proposals
ZIP-0005

Post-Quantum Security for DeFi & NFTs

Final
Type
Standards Track
Category
Security
Author
Zoo Team
Created
2024-12-20

ZIP-5: Post-Quantum Security for DeFi & NFTs

Abstract

This proposal mandates Post-Quantum Cryptography for all Zoo ecosystem components, including DeFi protocols, NFT marketplace, and gaming infrastructure. Building on Lux Network's PQC implementation (LP-100) and Hanzo's AI security (HIP-5), this ensures quantum-resistant protection for user assets and transactions.

Motivation

The Zoo ecosystem manages significant value through:

  1. DeFi Protocols: Billions in TVL requiring long-term security
  2. NFT Assets: Unique digital assets with perpetual value
  3. Gaming Assets: In-game items and currencies
  4. User Wallets: Private keys needing quantum resistance
  5. Smart Contracts: Immutable code requiring future-proof signatures

Quantum computers threaten all current cryptographic protections. Zoo must implement PQC before quantum threats materialize.

Specification

PQC Integration Stack

Zoo Application Layer
├── Smart Contracts (PQC signatures)
├── NFT Metadata (PQC encryption)
├── Game Assets (PQC protected)
└── User Wallets (PQC keys)
    ↓
Lux Network (LP-100)
├── ML-KEM-768 (Key encapsulation)
├── ML-DSA-65 (Digital signatures)
└── Hybrid Mode (Defense-in-depth)

Smart Contract Security

PQC-Enhanced Contracts

contract PQCSecureVault {
    // Quantum-resistant signature verification
    mapping(address => bytes) public mlDsaPublicKeys;
    
    modifier requiresPQCSignature(
        bytes memory signature,
        bytes32 messageHash
    ) {
        require(
            verifyMLDSA(msg.sender, messageHash, signature),
            "Invalid PQC signature"
        );
        _;
    }
    
    function deposit(
        uint256 amount,
        bytes memory pqcSignature
    ) external requiresPQCSignature(
        pqcSignature,
        keccak256(abi.encode(amount, nonce[msg.sender]))
    ) {
        // Deposit logic
    }
}

NFT Protection

Quantum-Safe NFT Standard (ZRC-721-PQC)

{
  "name": "Quantum Resistant NFT",
  "description": "NFT with PQC protection",
  "image": "ipfs://...",
  "pqc_metadata": {
    "encrypted_attributes": "ML-KEM encrypted data",
    "creator_signature": {
      "algorithm": "ML-DSA-65",
      "public_key": "0x...",
      "signature": "0x..."
    },
    "provenance_chain": [
      {
        "owner": "0x...",
        "timestamp": 1703001234,
        "pqc_signature": "0x..."
      }
    ]
  }
}

DeFi Protocol Updates

Yield Vault with PQC

interface IPQCYieldVault {
    // Deposit with quantum-resistant authorization
    function depositWithPQC(
        uint256 amount,
        bytes calldata mlKemPublicKey,
        bytes calldata mlDsaSignature
    ) external;
    
    // Withdraw with PQC verification
    function withdrawWithPQC(
        uint256 shares,
        bytes calldata pqcProof
    ) external;
    
    // Emergency withdrawal with multi-sig PQC
    function emergencyWithdraw(
        bytes[] calldata pqcSignatures
    ) external;
}

Wallet Integration

Quantum-Safe Wallet Structure

interface PQCWallet {
  // Classical keys (for compatibility)
  classicalAddress: string;
  classicalPrivateKey: string;
  
  // PQC keys
  mlKemKeyPair: {
    public: Uint8Array;
    secret: Uint8Array;
  };
  
  mlDsaKeyPair: {
    public: Uint8Array;
    secret: Uint8Array;
  };
  
  // Hybrid mode enabled
  hybridMode: boolean;
}

Gaming Asset Security

Secure Game Items

class PQCGameItem {
  id: string;
  owner: string;
  attributes: EncryptedData;  // ML-KEM encrypted
  signature: MLDSASignature;   // Authenticity proof
  
  transfer(newOwner: string, pqcAuth: PQCAuthorization) {
    // Verify PQC authorization
    if (!verifyPQC(pqcAuth)) {
      throw new Error("Invalid PQC authorization");
    }
    
    // Transfer with quantum-resistant proof
    this.owner = newOwner;
    this.signature = signWithMLDSA(this);
  }
}

Migration Strategy

Phase 1: Dual Support (Current)

  • Support both classical and PQC
  • New contracts PQC-enabled
  • Gradual user migration

Phase 2: PQC Default (Q2 2025)

  • PQC becomes default
  • Classical marked deprecated
  • Migration incentives

Phase 3: PQC Only (Q4 2025)

  • Classical support removed
  • Full quantum resistance
  • Legacy bridge for old assets

Privacy Tiers

TierApplicationProtection Level
0Public dataBasic PQC
1User assets+ Encrypted storage
2High-value NFTs+ TEE verification
3Treasury ops+ Multi-sig PQC
4Critical infrastructure+ Full TEE-I/O

Rationale

Why Now?

  • Quantum Timeline: Threats expected within 5-10 years
  • Asset Longevity: NFTs and DeFi positions held long-term
  • First Mover: Competitive advantage in security
  • User Trust: Demonstrates commitment to security

Why These Algorithms?

  • ML-KEM-768: Optimal balance of security and performance
  • ML-DSA-65: Reasonable signature sizes for blockchain
  • Hybrid Mode: Protection against both quantum and classical attacks

Security Considerations

Threat Model

  • Quantum Attacks: Shor's algorithm breaks ECDSA
  • Retroactive Attacks: "Harvest now, decrypt later"
  • Smart Contract Risks: Immutable code needs future-proof security
  • Cross-chain Risks: Bridge security critical

Risk Mitigation

  • Regular Audits: Continuous security assessment
  • Bug Bounties: Incentivize vulnerability discovery
  • Insurance Fund: Coverage for potential issues
  • Gradual Rollout: Phased implementation

Implementation

Completed

  • Lux Network PQC (LP-100)
  • Core library integration
  • Initial testing

Q1 2025

  • Smart contract templates
  • Wallet SDK updates
  • NFT standard finalization

Q2 2025

  • DeFi protocol migration
  • Gaming integration
  • User migration tools

Q3 2025

  • Full ecosystem coverage
  • Performance optimization
  • Documentation complete

Testing

Security Tests

  • Quantum attack simulation
  • Side-channel analysis
  • Formal verification

Integration Tests

  • Cross-chain compatibility
  • Wallet integration
  • Gas optimization

Performance Benchmarks

  • Transaction throughput
  • Signature verification time
  • Storage requirements

Reference Implementation

Repository: zooai/pqc

Key Files:

  • /crypto/ml_dsa.rs - ML-DSA (FIPS 204) implementation
  • /crypto/ml_kem.rs - ML-KEM (FIPS 203) implementation
  • /crypto/slh_dsa.rs - SLH-DSA (FIPS 205) implementation
  • /contracts/PQCWallet.sol - Post-quantum wallet contract
  • /contracts/PQCSignatureVerifier.sol - On-chain signature verification
  • /contracts/PQCERC721.sol - Post-quantum NFT standard
  • /sdk/typescript/ - TypeScript SDK for PQC operations
  • /sdk/rust/ - Rust SDK for high-performance applications
  • /migration/wallet_migration.py - Tool for migrating existing wallets
  • /migration/contract_migration.sol - Contract upgrade patterns
  • /tests/quantum_attack_sim.py - Quantum attack simulation tests
  • /tests/performance_benchmarks.rs - Performance testing suite
  • /docs/migration_guide.md - Step-by-step migration instructions

Status: Implemented (Based on LP-100 integration)

Reference Standards:

  • NIST FIPS 203 (ML-KEM)
  • NIST FIPS 204 (ML-DSA)
  • NIST FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)
  • Lux LP-200 (Post-Quantum Cryptography Suite)

Integration with Lux:

  • Shares crypto primitives with Lux Network LP-200
  • Compatible with Lux post-quantum precompiles
  • Cross-chain PQC message verification

References

  1. LP-100: NIST PQC Integration for Lux
  2. HIP-5: Post-Quantum Security for AI
  3. NIST PQC Standards
  4. ZIP-0: Zoo Ecosystem Architecture
  5. ZIP-1: HLLMs for Zoo

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.